🔗 Share this article

The Four Spent the Day Together is populated with protagonists pursuing fresh starts, attempting to leave behind addictions or harmful partnerships, only to witness hope devolve into conflict. The author repeatedly invokes the phrase "new beginning", making it deliberately jaded through recurring use. Phrases such as "He was ready for a new beginning" and "They chose to begin anew" are scattered across the story. And yet, she appears to be undertaking her own fresh start, since this appears a new kind of book – documentarian, authentically narrative. Yet it reveals itself to be filled with the recurring issues and aesthetics as earlier books.

From Accidental Writer to Renowned Book

Kraus began as an visual artist who became a writer almost accidentally with her 1997 groundbreaking book I Love Dick, structured as epistles to an unresponsive love interest, elevating intimate women's literature from humiliation into rebellion. She continued writing, but the next trio of engaging and challenging novels lacked the shock and immediacy that the letter form infused into the narrative voice of I Love Dick. It didn't help was her position as a renegade artist who had become a extensive real estate holder, so there was significant attention on property transactions. It is logical that she currently desires to experiment with different types of content, directing her gaze to external narratives, at a period in which she claims that contemporary political climate makes confessional writing redundant.

Three Generations, Shared Inescapable History

The Four Spent the Day Together is organized into a trio of segments, encompassing several time periods – each trapped by their backgrounds. The book includes the tale of Emma and Jasper, representations of Kraus's parents, relocating from the urban environment to a pastoral setting. There is the story of Kraus herself, in the guise of protagonist Catt Greene, grappling with the delayed acclaim of I Love Dick, the emergence of Trump, and her addict husband Paul. The third thread involves the narrative of a homicide of one directionless individual by another in a locality largely deserted by forward-thinking policies only 80 miles from the protagonist's home in rural Minnesota.

From my perspective as a reader drawn to refined literature of the sort Kraus typically rejects, I was captivated by the novelistic voice of the opening part.

Being a reader who appreciates crafted language of the kind that Kraus tends to eschew, I was seduced by the storytelling approach of the initial part. There is a novel degree of detail that allows space for small details, like the container that the youthful Catt pries out of frozen water at the beginning of the narrative, aided by her adored dad. "I found an ice toy!" she declares; "a great plaything", he answers, "the elliptical meanings of words circulating in their speech like sweet treats". She tells Emma's story with curiosity and intimacy. "Emma felt like she'd stepped into a dream – not precisely her dream."

Disappointment and Disjunction

I was destined to be disappointed when I hoped this fresh tone could continue through the novel. The author states here that she resents the satisfaction readers like me have derived from I Love Dick; she's dedicated to disruption, to the messy artistic approach she echoes from her inspiration author Kathy Acker, and the emptiness and redundancy of her previous novels returns in the second segment. Catt is working on refurbishing multiple decrepit residences in the most troubled areas of Albuquerque while moving between Minnesota and LA, failing to help Paul manage his alcohol use. She feels helpless as her spouse cycles through low-resource employment as an recovery specialist in a environment propelled by the hostility and dread that drives Trump's victory. Multiple pages are devoted about Catt's social media ostracism on Twitter, her professional designation altered from "author" to "real estate holder" on a reference site. The author still appears to invest excessive emotion about this. In a moment she states that she's looking into the killing so that before leaving Minnesota, "she could potentially understand something about an the United States that her online critics would not understand, would not even see".

The Murder Narrative

So then we come to the actual killing – and the eponymous day passed by the deceased with the perpetrator and his companions. The author possesses great source material, and details moment by moment what happened when a man named Brandon came to see Brittney after meeting her on an app where she offered adult photos. He sought a sexual encounter but seems amiably to have occupied the day with her companions, loitering getting his car mended and funding treats and narcotics, before being shot by Brittney's partner Micah – a youth with psychological issues who has frequently been hospitalised for aggressive outbursts.

Fascination and Incompletion

Catt gets obsessed by the account, and I was intrigued by the way that Kraus's dual urges towards ethical reporting and audacious rule-breaking clash in this segment. However, I would have preferred her to explore more thoroughly her personal fixations here. The compelling persona is Brittney herself, who gains dimension partially because of Catt seeing herself in her – yet another intelligent, harassed young woman spiraling out of control in a troubled, forgotten town. Kraus tells us that Catt converses with Brittney in jail, but she fails to enact these dialogues. The whole section feels curiously unresolved, to the degree that Kraus's narration ends almost mid-par